A token is a physical memento, souvenir, or keepsake serving to represent or indicate some fact, event, feeling, or sign. It is a characteristic indication or mark showing evidence or proof and is used to indicate authenticity and authority.
At least that's what the dictionary says it is.
In Magic, a token is a marker used to represent a permanent. The spell or ability that created the token may set values of the token.
In Portland, I received a token. I'd like to tell you about it . . .
On April 16th of this year I worked my first day as a Magic judge. After a very long day working on the floor, registration, then prize wall, I sat alone taking late registrations for the Super Sunday Series, when Head Judge Sean Catanese took the time to introduce himself to me as he left the building. That moment constituted a turning point in my judge career. On the heels of a less than pleasant encounter where someone had belittled me and in my exhausted state, I struggled with my decision to become a judge. I felt like perhaps I had taken the wrong road, or that no one would ever really accept me as a judge since I was a newer player, and female too. When Sean stopped to welcome me, it changed my perspective. A man in a burgundy shirt had acknowledged me and legitimized my position as a member of the program with the simple words, "Welcome to the family!"
The next day I stood a little taller in my black judge shirt and I smiled at a few more judges hoping that they would smile back. The judge community is filled with awesome people, and by that evening I was enjoying drinks and drafting with a bunch of new friends. Little did I know that I birthed a few traditions that night and made memories that will last a lifetime. (You can read more about Albuquerque here.)
Since then I have labored to improve my craft. If you know my personality at all, you know that I strive to reach the elite tiers of any endeavor I undertake. I like to "do the thing," whatever it may be, at the highest level. I fast tracked my way to L2 just 3 months later despite my awkward beginnings as a judge. I located a mentor who could teach me the rules, and committed to weekly late night study sessions. I traveled to another GP as well as working an SCG Open, some local events, and a 1K in Austin where I tested at the HJ's home afterwards. I also threw myself into the judge community writing tournament reports, planning a regional judge conference, and working with our Area Captain on local judge meet-ups. I sought mentors who could teach me the intricacies of policy and philosophy as I broadened my views and worked more outside my region.
The culmination of my efforts came when Cascade Games asked me to serve as the Registration Lead for GP Portland. Ok, so I might have mentioned a few ideas for improving the registration process after Albuquerque. And I might have demonstrated my assertive leadership skills at Dreamhack. And I might have been completely shocked when not only did I not receive a reprimand for being presumptuous, but I was offered the opportunity to apply my skills to an actual event.
My arrival in Portland on Thursday afternoon followed an early morning with my kids, a 4 hour flight, a 3 hour drive (including a death defying dash across a street in pursuit of a chicken sandwich), and a 2 hour time change. After a quick stop at the hotel to freshen up, I headed to the venue to meet with the Cascade folks and check out the set-up. I enjoyed meeting some new faces and reconnecting with old friends as we set up and planned for an exciting weekend. The evening finished with several judges dining at a place called The Screen Door, which served comfort food in a Cracker Barrel-like atmosphere. Exhausted, we returned to the hotel where we stayed up too late chatting before crashing.
Friday I awoke early not exactly refreshed after a night of sharing a too small and not terribly comfortable bed with another judge. After a quick shower and dressing quietly to preserve the sleep of my roommates, I realized that I had no time for breakfast. I left my Starbucks order, cash, and a note on the bathroom mirror hoping that one of them would take pity on me. Upon arriving at the venue at 7am, I jumped into my work preparing for the day, greeting my team, and setting up our system. Despite some last minute craziness we got off to a good start, but were quickly overwhelmed by over 600 players showing up at 11am for the mini-masters. Throughout the day I worked hard to make appropriate changes to our system to accommodate the needs of the event and received support from the Cascade Games staff when I needed it. Towards the end of a crazy, busy, fun day I snuck out for dinner with a judge with whom I had been hoping to connect. Realizing that I hadn't eaten since my roommate's gracious Starbucks delivery that morning illuminated just how busy I had been and how much I had learned. Upon returning to my hotel, another roommate greeted me with a glass of wine and I enjoyed their company until I fell asleep.
Saturday proved to be another long but amazing day working with my awesome registration team. Those folks worked so hard that I treated them to Starbucks, twice! I wish I could have done more because their efforts made a crazy day manageable and fun. Despite the stresses of a large event with multiple demands to balance, I felt proud that I could lead my team effectively, communicate with my supervisors, and generally make things happen. While I'll skip the details that only a true logistics nerd (ok, yes, me) would love, I will says that I was able to manage my staff through trading/sharing with another team lead, I devised solutions to complicated problems by allowing others to shine in areas of expertise, and I never lost that personal connection with the people on my team.
Sometime on Saturday I found myself on the stage with Sean Catanese, who I had not spoken to since that day in Albuquerque. Since I knew this was his final GP to Head Judge, I wanted to take the opportunity to thank him for welcoming me on my first day as on the floor. Our brief chat ended with an interruption, but the interaction made me happy after being able to thank him in person.
Back at the hotel that night, my feet hurt too bad to even move. Luckily my Starbucks-deliveing roommate was willing to order us a pizza and go pick up some beer. Also luckily, I managed to stay awake long enough to consume a slice before falling asleep.
Sunday brought a calmer day at registration, still filled with exciting challenges and opportunities to develop my management skills. Conflict resolution and decision making skills occasions abounded when unexpected events occurred. Feeling my own confidence grow as the Cascade Games staff demonstrated their trust in me also seemed a fitting end to the weekend. Since registration closed before most of the rest of the event, my day even ended a bit early allowing me a few extra minutes to relax with judge friends that night.
Sometime during the afternoon, Sean sought me out and pulled me aside. While I wish I could remember his exact words, my overwhelmed brain cannot, so the thought will have to suffice. He told me that my comments the day before had meant a lot to him. He also gave me a poker chip about 1.5 inches in diameter and bearing a white mana symbol on its face. He explained that he was handing them out to judges throughout the weekend. As its weight settled into my hand, I felt the weight of the moment as well. A senior judge in the program had passed on to me a token, setting its value as excellence in judging.
Once again, Sean had used a simple interaction to convey a message of great depth. He recognized my contributions to the judge program, affirmed my role as a judge, and boosted my confidence, all in a 2-3 minute conversation. The beauty and talent in his leadership both impressed me and inspired me to look for ways to do the same for other judges.
Now that token resides in my pocket when I'm on the floor. Each time I feel its weight or brush it with my hand it serves as a reminder to encourage other judges. I'm sure that one day, the time will come to pass that precious token along to a judge who needs it more than me, but in the meantime, I it will remind me to continue sharing Sean's message that 'you are valued' with judges that I encounter.
Reflections on my experiences in the Magic judge program as I learn and improve my craft.
Friday, September 23, 2016
Monday, September 19, 2016
Exemplar
Today I received an amazing surprise! I received an exemplar nomination from someone I have never met. Upon doing a bit of research I realized that we have never worked an event together, have no mutual friends that I know of, and don't even live in the same country. To say I was shocked would be an understatement.
Why, then would this person nominate me?
For writing "Judge Reports."
While I don't necessary consider tournament report writing exemplary because most judges have written one at one time or another, I do consider it something I'm passionate about. I love judging; I love writing; and I love writing about judging. Even more than that, I love knowing that my writing about judging has had a positive impact on someone else.
While the main goal of this blog is for me to have a place to put my thoughts as I organize them and process my experiences, I have opted to make it public so that others can share those experiences as well. Maybe we have things in common? Maybe we approach things completely differently? Maybe something I wrote will help you out at your next event? Maybe we'll have a discussion later about something you read?
The idea that my simple prose contributes positively to the judge community really excites me. Judges love helping each other - me included! And being able to do it through a channel that I'm passionate about is even better!
So in short, a huge thanks to everyone who reads my blog and my JudgeApps forum posts. I appreciate you letting me be a part of your judge journey and I'm glad that you are a part of mine.
Also want to give a special shout out to the Exemplar Team. You guys do great and often thankless work implementing this program and you are appreciated too!
Note: While receiving this nomination was cool, now that it's been done, it need not be repeated.
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Q&A with the HJ
On August 6th I worked my first "mid-sized event." We had 203 players and 8 judges. So I've worked some GPs with huge staffs and tons of sides, and I've judged small GPTs and PPTQs, but this was my first 'medium' experience. I've pondered some of the issues a Head Judge faces at this type of event and have come up with the following reflections.
The day's start inspired hopes for great things. We started on time and the SK brought doughnuts and kolaches! He then demonstrated putting a kolache in the pocket of his judge shirt for easy access later making our whole team laugh. Such a great group of guys!
Finding a way to cover all the event's needs without the manpower to create true teams comprises one of the Head Judge's challenges. Our HJ opted to use the Taskmaster System. I had never encountered this system previously, and to be honest, I didn't like it. He assigned a judge to be in charge of each task, and that judge's responsibility included getting the task done by locating available judges to do it. While simply asking others to help made sense, in reality few were available and willing when the need arose. Since most of our team had little experience working together, we lacked both the personal chemistry and the understanding of one another’s roles to effectively employ this method. It felt awkward and unorganized to me.
An example: In my role as slips taskmaster, I needed to ensure the distribution of match slips at the start of each round. The SKs printed these a few minutes after each round began. At previous events, my SKs had used multi-print to produce slips with the pairings, so my expectation of earlier slips often led to me hanging around the paper cutter awaiting my slips. I likely could have waited until pairings posted, and then head to the judge station, however I did not want to appear late or unavailable when the time came to complete my task. Also, the HJ had asked another judge to take the slips off the printer and hand them to me. Neither of us really understood this request, and we joked about it each round as he handed them to me. As far as actually passing them out: Some rounds, three judges grabbed slips. Some rounds no one was ready, so I handled them solo. When I asked the HJ to pass out slips, he griped, and I wondered if I’d done something wrong.
My frustrations built throughout the day, but after some serious debriefing with the HJ, I have a much better understanding of this system. He carefully explained the reasoning behind each of his decisions as well as where he felt like he could improve his implementation of the process. After that conversation I am eager to try it again. Moral of the story: If you don't understand something, don't be afraid to ask. Sometimes veteran HJs don't realize that a new person will need a more detailed explanation.
Backup? Amir and Niko call me to the table during combat. The board state clearly shows declared attackers, however both players insist that an activated Gideon should have a +1/+1 counter on it from Nissa's second ability. My initial thought was, 'easy fix, here's your counter,' but I knew that such a partial fix is not supported by policy. The idea of a backup came to me next - just go back, add the counter, and then redeclare the attackers. I asked the players to wait, and sought the HJ's approval. When I explained what I wanted to do, he quickly authorized me to do it. I returned to the table and explained the fix to both players, who happily started to back things up on the board. I stopped them so that we could walk back through it step-by-step when they began telling me all the things that had happened at the beginning of combat including flipping a morphed Den Protector and sacrificing a creature to an Evolutionary Leap. I instantly realized that this backup signaled an imminent disaster. I returned to the HJ and relayed that due to additional information from the players I no longer wished to perform the backup. He again supported my decision. I informed the players that too much had happened to back up, so the board state would remain as it was. I did issue a GRV and a FtMGS for the missed counter and the game resumed. The moral of the story: No matter how much you may want to 'fix' the game state, sometimes that's not possible. And my judge lesson: Ask better questions before reaching a conclusion.
My first appeal. Nick called me to the table and stated that he was controlling Avery's turn due to Emrakul's ability. He wanted to cast a Spell Queller and use its triggered ability to target itself. I picked up the Spell Queller and read it just to be sure of how the ability's wording read, then I explained that he would not be able to do that. Since it is a triggered ability, it would not trigger until after the Spell Queller resolves and enters the battlefield, thus at that time Spell Queller would no longer be a spell on the stack and therefore not a legal target for the triggered ability. It seemed to me to be a relatively straightforward call, so my surprise must have been evident when Nick politely appealed. I marched with purpose to the HJ, who busily conversed with another judge. I remembered my training and opted to interrupt since appeals are time sensitive. When I approached he said, "You look like you have an appeal." I replied affirmatively and explained the situation as we walked to the table. The HJ introduced himself to the players and confirmed my ruling, which they readily accepted. The whole thing felt rather anticlimactic to me. An appeal of a straightforward ruling with no issues and happy players. Well, I guess that's how it's supposed to go.
Randomizing the last round. As we approached the end of the Swiss rounds, I overheard the TO ask the SK if she knew how to randomize the final round of Swiss. My ears perked up as this made no sense to me. Wouldn't randomizing the last round effectively destroy the standings? Afraid to ask, I watched and waited as the round began. Since my role cutting slips kept me at the scorer's table, I observed as a judge went through the pairings and marked relevant matches, and then assigned judges to watch those tables. I finally realized that the pairings were not adjusted, just the seatings. Clearly intended to reduce the impact of players watching one another to see who plays and who draws, it seemed to add confusion to the situation as well. I can't say I particularly liked the idea, but I can understand its purpose, and I'll keep an open mind when I see it again.
Questionable call. As Amos and Nathan entered game 3, Nathan realized that he only had 59 cards and called a judge. After noting that they had matching sleeves, I quickly located the card in Amos's deck. Realizing that this situation called for a D/DLP penalty, but qualified for a downgrade, I approached the HJ to ask for the downgrade. The HJ approved it, but instructed me to give both players Warnings. It felt off to me because Nathan had not yet presented his deck when I was called, but since the HJ told me to do so, I did. The players were not pleased. After handling the situation with the players, I returned to the HJ and asked him to further explain his ruling to me since I didn't understand. He stated that his option reduced the likelihood of Amos waiting until he knew Nathan was missing a card to call a judge, thus trying to gain an advantage from the situation. It still felt off to me, so after chatting some more and talking to other judges, the HJ said that he probably should have ruled it differently. Also I should have been clearer about the fact that Nathan had not yet presented his deck when he called a judge. Lesson: If you believe that an error is occurring, speak up. Second lesson: Ask the HJ if you don't understand his decision. The ensuing discussion is really enlightening.
Group debrief. At the end of the day I sat down with the HJ for a debrief. I really appreciate him taking the time to talk with me about the event, even while the Top 8 played. He offered me a few simple pieces of advice such as moving faster, saying that I did well and he really didn't have much for me. Then one of the most senior judges from the event joined us and gave me his evaluation. Next the TO who is also a judge came by and said, "Can I get in on this?" Inwardly I laughed at the panel-style debrief and felt a little bit overwhelmed but also so grateful that so many judges want to help me improve. After a few minutes, just the TO and I were left alone and we talked a long time, with a few interruptions. Being our first time working together, we had a lot more than just the event to discuss, and we skimmed the surface of quite a few topics. My mind filled with so much more that I longed to cover, but our time ran out and we both needed to get home. While I left once again frustrated, I felt like I had a lot to think about.
In the week that followed this event, the HJ and I chatted a lot over the internet. In fact, we combed through the minutia and he answered every single question I asked. I learned so much about tournament operations and how things are done at a mid-sized event. While it comprised a bit of a tough day for me, I loved every minute of being on the floor and working with my fellow judges. I'd like to send an extra special thanks to my Head Judge for staffing me, teaching me, debriefing me, and as always having confidence in me. I look forward to my next event with him!
The day's start inspired hopes for great things. We started on time and the SK brought doughnuts and kolaches! He then demonstrated putting a kolache in the pocket of his judge shirt for easy access later making our whole team laugh. Such a great group of guys!
Finding a way to cover all the event's needs without the manpower to create true teams comprises one of the Head Judge's challenges. Our HJ opted to use the Taskmaster System. I had never encountered this system previously, and to be honest, I didn't like it. He assigned a judge to be in charge of each task, and that judge's responsibility included getting the task done by locating available judges to do it. While simply asking others to help made sense, in reality few were available and willing when the need arose. Since most of our team had little experience working together, we lacked both the personal chemistry and the understanding of one another’s roles to effectively employ this method. It felt awkward and unorganized to me.
An example: In my role as slips taskmaster, I needed to ensure the distribution of match slips at the start of each round. The SKs printed these a few minutes after each round began. At previous events, my SKs had used multi-print to produce slips with the pairings, so my expectation of earlier slips often led to me hanging around the paper cutter awaiting my slips. I likely could have waited until pairings posted, and then head to the judge station, however I did not want to appear late or unavailable when the time came to complete my task. Also, the HJ had asked another judge to take the slips off the printer and hand them to me. Neither of us really understood this request, and we joked about it each round as he handed them to me. As far as actually passing them out: Some rounds, three judges grabbed slips. Some rounds no one was ready, so I handled them solo. When I asked the HJ to pass out slips, he griped, and I wondered if I’d done something wrong.
My frustrations built throughout the day, but after some serious debriefing with the HJ, I have a much better understanding of this system. He carefully explained the reasoning behind each of his decisions as well as where he felt like he could improve his implementation of the process. After that conversation I am eager to try it again. Moral of the story: If you don't understand something, don't be afraid to ask. Sometimes veteran HJs don't realize that a new person will need a more detailed explanation.
Backup? Amir and Niko call me to the table during combat. The board state clearly shows declared attackers, however both players insist that an activated Gideon should have a +1/+1 counter on it from Nissa's second ability. My initial thought was, 'easy fix, here's your counter,' but I knew that such a partial fix is not supported by policy. The idea of a backup came to me next - just go back, add the counter, and then redeclare the attackers. I asked the players to wait, and sought the HJ's approval. When I explained what I wanted to do, he quickly authorized me to do it. I returned to the table and explained the fix to both players, who happily started to back things up on the board. I stopped them so that we could walk back through it step-by-step when they began telling me all the things that had happened at the beginning of combat including flipping a morphed Den Protector and sacrificing a creature to an Evolutionary Leap. I instantly realized that this backup signaled an imminent disaster. I returned to the HJ and relayed that due to additional information from the players I no longer wished to perform the backup. He again supported my decision. I informed the players that too much had happened to back up, so the board state would remain as it was. I did issue a GRV and a FtMGS for the missed counter and the game resumed. The moral of the story: No matter how much you may want to 'fix' the game state, sometimes that's not possible. And my judge lesson: Ask better questions before reaching a conclusion.
My first appeal. Nick called me to the table and stated that he was controlling Avery's turn due to Emrakul's ability. He wanted to cast a Spell Queller and use its triggered ability to target itself. I picked up the Spell Queller and read it just to be sure of how the ability's wording read, then I explained that he would not be able to do that. Since it is a triggered ability, it would not trigger until after the Spell Queller resolves and enters the battlefield, thus at that time Spell Queller would no longer be a spell on the stack and therefore not a legal target for the triggered ability. It seemed to me to be a relatively straightforward call, so my surprise must have been evident when Nick politely appealed. I marched with purpose to the HJ, who busily conversed with another judge. I remembered my training and opted to interrupt since appeals are time sensitive. When I approached he said, "You look like you have an appeal." I replied affirmatively and explained the situation as we walked to the table. The HJ introduced himself to the players and confirmed my ruling, which they readily accepted. The whole thing felt rather anticlimactic to me. An appeal of a straightforward ruling with no issues and happy players. Well, I guess that's how it's supposed to go.
Randomizing the last round. As we approached the end of the Swiss rounds, I overheard the TO ask the SK if she knew how to randomize the final round of Swiss. My ears perked up as this made no sense to me. Wouldn't randomizing the last round effectively destroy the standings? Afraid to ask, I watched and waited as the round began. Since my role cutting slips kept me at the scorer's table, I observed as a judge went through the pairings and marked relevant matches, and then assigned judges to watch those tables. I finally realized that the pairings were not adjusted, just the seatings. Clearly intended to reduce the impact of players watching one another to see who plays and who draws, it seemed to add confusion to the situation as well. I can't say I particularly liked the idea, but I can understand its purpose, and I'll keep an open mind when I see it again.
Questionable call. As Amos and Nathan entered game 3, Nathan realized that he only had 59 cards and called a judge. After noting that they had matching sleeves, I quickly located the card in Amos's deck. Realizing that this situation called for a D/DLP penalty, but qualified for a downgrade, I approached the HJ to ask for the downgrade. The HJ approved it, but instructed me to give both players Warnings. It felt off to me because Nathan had not yet presented his deck when I was called, but since the HJ told me to do so, I did. The players were not pleased. After handling the situation with the players, I returned to the HJ and asked him to further explain his ruling to me since I didn't understand. He stated that his option reduced the likelihood of Amos waiting until he knew Nathan was missing a card to call a judge, thus trying to gain an advantage from the situation. It still felt off to me, so after chatting some more and talking to other judges, the HJ said that he probably should have ruled it differently. Also I should have been clearer about the fact that Nathan had not yet presented his deck when he called a judge. Lesson: If you believe that an error is occurring, speak up. Second lesson: Ask the HJ if you don't understand his decision. The ensuing discussion is really enlightening.
Group debrief. At the end of the day I sat down with the HJ for a debrief. I really appreciate him taking the time to talk with me about the event, even while the Top 8 played. He offered me a few simple pieces of advice such as moving faster, saying that I did well and he really didn't have much for me. Then one of the most senior judges from the event joined us and gave me his evaluation. Next the TO who is also a judge came by and said, "Can I get in on this?" Inwardly I laughed at the panel-style debrief and felt a little bit overwhelmed but also so grateful that so many judges want to help me improve. After a few minutes, just the TO and I were left alone and we talked a long time, with a few interruptions. Being our first time working together, we had a lot more than just the event to discuss, and we skimmed the surface of quite a few topics. My mind filled with so much more that I longed to cover, but our time ran out and we both needed to get home. While I left once again frustrated, I felt like I had a lot to think about.
In the week that followed this event, the HJ and I chatted a lot over the internet. In fact, we combed through the minutia and he answered every single question I asked. I learned so much about tournament operations and how things are done at a mid-sized event. While it comprised a bit of a tough day for me, I loved every minute of being on the floor and working with my fellow judges. I'd like to send an extra special thanks to my Head Judge for staffing me, teaching me, debriefing me, and as always having confidence in me. I look forward to my next event with him!
Friday, August 5, 2016
Know You
A lot of new judges ask: What do I need to do to prepare for my first Grand Prix? Veteran judges love to answer this question, and each has their own version or flavor. It usually includes comfortable shoes, drinking water, and bringing pens. Each conversation contains a lot of valuable information, but it can leave a new judge feeling confused or overwhelmed. I know it did for me! So here's my advice to a new judge preparing for his/her first large event.
This simple phrase trumps each specific detail that others may suggest. You are the expert on you. You know yourself better than everyone else, so you know how to apply the well-intentioned advice in a way that serves your personal needs.
Self Care - This is one of the first things new judges should understand. Quite simply: If you are too tired, sore, sick, or otherwise non-functional to do your job, you hurt the entire event. Yes, judges have passed out, vomited, and fallen asleep on the floor. Please don't be one of them. Get enough rest. Drink enough water. Eat healthy food including breakfast. Don't stay out too late partying with your roommates the night before. You've heard all those things. However, rather than saying 'you need to drink 8 glasses of water,' I'll say, "you need to understand your body's needs." Personally, I have a type of migraines caused by dehydration. To avoid them I need to drink 1-2 bottles of Gatorade per day to maintain my electrolyte balance. I also carry some trail mix in my bag for when I need a salty snack. Think about your personal preferences as far as eating, drinking, snacking, rest, and medications, then understand how those things affect your work as a judge. Make decisions that will have you feeling your best not just on Friday, but all weekend.
Dress Well - We'll start with the basics: your uniform. Please show up with clean, well fitting clothing in good repair. You make us all look bad when your BO precedes you to a table or your shirt looks like you slept in it (even if you did, iron it). If you need a judge shirt, be sure to let the TO know or borrow one from another judge. As far as shoes, wear comfortable ones that you can stand/walk all day it. Sitting down because your feet hurt provides bad customer service and makes you look lazy to your team lead. Best advice someone gave me: choose the kind of shoes that you normally wear every day, and buy them in black. Other tricks: wear comfortable undergarments that don't rub or chafe, yes I mean a 'judge bra' or 'judge underwear.' Also, since you won't be wearing your judge shirt unless you are on the floor working, you will want to wear an undershirt so that you can take it off. Some people put on a different shirt, commonly a regional polo over the undershirt. I've also seen just a jacket or vest worn over it, especially in colder climates. Whatever you choose is fine, remember this is about what makes you most comfortable.
Come Prepared - Bring at minimum some colored pens and a notepad. Better preparation includes sharpies, sticky notes, tape, scissors, and a highlighter. Again, this is personal preference here. I like to bring pens with multiple colors instead of multiple pens. I also like to bring a clipboard, but hate having a water bottle. Make sure that whatever you want to carry with you fits comfortably in your pockets.
Know Your Stuff - Make sure you have read/studied relevant information and the IPG. If it's sealed, read the release notes; it it's Legacy, be ready for Oracle text requests. If you you are Head Judging a 2HG side event, look over the 2HG stuff. You can almost always look up a ruling or ask another judge if you need to, so know the basics, but don't stress out over this one. Also, know when and how to get help. Ask your Team Lead or another judge if you need to. Being right is always better than being fast. Also, know when to say, "I'm pretty sure I know this, but I want to double check one detail." Then come back and say, "I was right, it's . . . ." There is no shame in consulting another judge, you will learn stuff and they will like helping you. Generally, judges worry about this one a lot, and really it's not that big of a deal.
Be There - Show up early. Listen well. Do the things you are supposed to do. Nothing is more frustrating than a judge who is MIA. Don't make your Team Lead have to wait on you, look for you, or wonder why your work is not done. If you have a problem, need to go to the bathroom, or don't know how to do a task - ASK. Communication is key here. For example, if the Head Judge asks you to go get him coffee, don't wander off to do it without telling your Team Lead who will be expecting you to hang pairings in 3 minutes. The Head Judge will be ok with you hanging pairings and then getting the coffee. There are a lot of people doing a lot of things. To make the event smooth, all of those things have to be coordinated. Be a team player here and pay attention to what's going on around you; it will help you, your team, and the event.
Learn Something - While this may go without saying, your goal should always be to improve yourself and your craft. Meet some new people. Try a new skill. Maybe you have never done a Polish method deck check. Maybe you have never been on the pairings team. Perhaps you can work a shift at registration or help breakdown afterwards. It could be a trick to remember people's names or asking about someone's cool shoes. If you think you have nothing left to improve upon, you should probably consider being done judging. Most judges love to help, teach, and mentor, so don't be shy. Ask about what you want to know. Observe carefully. Think critically. Make sure that when you leave, you are a better judge than when you arrived.
Write It Down - No matter how sure you are that you won't forget, write it down. Take notes about cool interactions. Jot down that player's name and table number. Scrawl a note so you don't forget. You'll be surprised how much information will come at you and how fast. With so much going on, don't risk it - write it. It also helps you appear collected and competent to have good notes when talking to a HJ or Team Lead. Notes make writing reviews and tournament reports later much easier too. Writing doesn't end when the event does. Committing your thoughts to paper makes them shareable so others can learn from you too.
Have Fun - Trite, maybe, but true. If you're not having fun, you're doing it wrong. Enjoy the energy, the camaraderie, the challenges, and the triumphs. It'll fly by, so be prepared to apply to your next GP soon!
KNOW YOU
This simple phrase trumps each specific detail that others may suggest. You are the expert on you. You know yourself better than everyone else, so you know how to apply the well-intentioned advice in a way that serves your personal needs.
Self Care - This is one of the first things new judges should understand. Quite simply: If you are too tired, sore, sick, or otherwise non-functional to do your job, you hurt the entire event. Yes, judges have passed out, vomited, and fallen asleep on the floor. Please don't be one of them. Get enough rest. Drink enough water. Eat healthy food including breakfast. Don't stay out too late partying with your roommates the night before. You've heard all those things. However, rather than saying 'you need to drink 8 glasses of water,' I'll say, "you need to understand your body's needs." Personally, I have a type of migraines caused by dehydration. To avoid them I need to drink 1-2 bottles of Gatorade per day to maintain my electrolyte balance. I also carry some trail mix in my bag for when I need a salty snack. Think about your personal preferences as far as eating, drinking, snacking, rest, and medications, then understand how those things affect your work as a judge. Make decisions that will have you feeling your best not just on Friday, but all weekend.
Dress Well - We'll start with the basics: your uniform. Please show up with clean, well fitting clothing in good repair. You make us all look bad when your BO precedes you to a table or your shirt looks like you slept in it (even if you did, iron it). If you need a judge shirt, be sure to let the TO know or borrow one from another judge. As far as shoes, wear comfortable ones that you can stand/walk all day it. Sitting down because your feet hurt provides bad customer service and makes you look lazy to your team lead. Best advice someone gave me: choose the kind of shoes that you normally wear every day, and buy them in black. Other tricks: wear comfortable undergarments that don't rub or chafe, yes I mean a 'judge bra' or 'judge underwear.' Also, since you won't be wearing your judge shirt unless you are on the floor working, you will want to wear an undershirt so that you can take it off. Some people put on a different shirt, commonly a regional polo over the undershirt. I've also seen just a jacket or vest worn over it, especially in colder climates. Whatever you choose is fine, remember this is about what makes you most comfortable.
Come Prepared - Bring at minimum some colored pens and a notepad. Better preparation includes sharpies, sticky notes, tape, scissors, and a highlighter. Again, this is personal preference here. I like to bring pens with multiple colors instead of multiple pens. I also like to bring a clipboard, but hate having a water bottle. Make sure that whatever you want to carry with you fits comfortably in your pockets.
Know Your Stuff - Make sure you have read/studied relevant information and the IPG. If it's sealed, read the release notes; it it's Legacy, be ready for Oracle text requests. If you you are Head Judging a 2HG side event, look over the 2HG stuff. You can almost always look up a ruling or ask another judge if you need to, so know the basics, but don't stress out over this one. Also, know when and how to get help. Ask your Team Lead or another judge if you need to. Being right is always better than being fast. Also, know when to say, "I'm pretty sure I know this, but I want to double check one detail." Then come back and say, "I was right, it's . . . ." There is no shame in consulting another judge, you will learn stuff and they will like helping you. Generally, judges worry about this one a lot, and really it's not that big of a deal.
Be There - Show up early. Listen well. Do the things you are supposed to do. Nothing is more frustrating than a judge who is MIA. Don't make your Team Lead have to wait on you, look for you, or wonder why your work is not done. If you have a problem, need to go to the bathroom, or don't know how to do a task - ASK. Communication is key here. For example, if the Head Judge asks you to go get him coffee, don't wander off to do it without telling your Team Lead who will be expecting you to hang pairings in 3 minutes. The Head Judge will be ok with you hanging pairings and then getting the coffee. There are a lot of people doing a lot of things. To make the event smooth, all of those things have to be coordinated. Be a team player here and pay attention to what's going on around you; it will help you, your team, and the event.
Learn Something - While this may go without saying, your goal should always be to improve yourself and your craft. Meet some new people. Try a new skill. Maybe you have never done a Polish method deck check. Maybe you have never been on the pairings team. Perhaps you can work a shift at registration or help breakdown afterwards. It could be a trick to remember people's names or asking about someone's cool shoes. If you think you have nothing left to improve upon, you should probably consider being done judging. Most judges love to help, teach, and mentor, so don't be shy. Ask about what you want to know. Observe carefully. Think critically. Make sure that when you leave, you are a better judge than when you arrived.
Write It Down - No matter how sure you are that you won't forget, write it down. Take notes about cool interactions. Jot down that player's name and table number. Scrawl a note so you don't forget. You'll be surprised how much information will come at you and how fast. With so much going on, don't risk it - write it. It also helps you appear collected and competent to have good notes when talking to a HJ or Team Lead. Notes make writing reviews and tournament reports later much easier too. Writing doesn't end when the event does. Committing your thoughts to paper makes them shareable so others can learn from you too.
Have Fun - Trite, maybe, but true. If you're not having fun, you're doing it wrong. Enjoy the energy, the camaraderie, the challenges, and the triumphs. It'll fly by, so be prepared to apply to your next GP soon!
Thursday, August 4, 2016
Unwritten
I was going to write an exemplar, but my words ran away with me and this got way too long and too personal to just submit as an exemplar . . .
To my judge mentor:
The time and effort that you have invested in me as a judge surpasses anything I could have ever imagined. From our first tentative talks where you told me to bring my husband along, our relationship has come a long way.
After I failed my first L1, you never let me stop working and learning. You dragged me through the intricacies of combat, first strike, double strike, protection, and trample. You encouraged me to keep applying to events, keep studying, and keep asking questions. (You even answered all those questions!) And above all, you repeated the mantra, "You ARE a judge." enough times that I actually started to believe it.
I could not have survived the stressful days leading up to my second L1 test without you. When I was in tears, you encouraged me. When I wanted to quit, you said you hoped I didn't. When I almost decided not to show up, the thought of disappointing you made me keep going. Somehow I dragged myself to that judge conference and took that test. And then, Nate wouldn't tell me how I did. I saw you at lunch, where I was far too nervous to eat, and you acted like you didn't know anything. After lunch you led me to that tiny room, silently closed the door, and solemnly told me to sit down. I think I can honestly say that is the most nervous I have ever been in my life. When you said, "I want to be the first person to congratulate you on becoming a judge" I just about fainted. Anger. Fear. Relief. And somewhere the insane thought that you had lied to me before about being a judge before passing the test.
Since that day you have continued to answer my innumerable questions (1 at a time) and never seem to tire of reiterating the details I yearn to understand. You have shared your wisdom as a judge and as Area Captain, even letting me help plan a local judge meet-up. You don't mind explaining things to me, including the how, and the why. The depth of our conversations helps me add the details to my skills that give polish to my work.
As I approached L2, your attitude towards my advancement shifted. You became distant and never encouraged me to test. You said that I would know when I was ready. You suggested that I not rush things. I took your hesitation as a sign that I was unprepared. I put off testing because I awaited your approval.
When we finally first worked together at Star City, you nearly made me laugh when you called me an experienced member of our team. It took some time to sink in that you were right. Those words took on a new meaning throughout the day as I realized that things were coming together and I felt confident on the floor delivering rulings, passing out slips, helping players, and flipping rounds. While working with you I realized how similarly we approach things and can see your influence in my 'style' of judging. I'm proud that I take after my mentor.
After that, I felt more ready to move forward, but still lacked your explicit statement of my readiness. My test came as a surprise, even to me! After I passed, I only wanted to tell 1 person - YOU. I needed some time to let that achievement sink in, but I couldn't wait to share it with you because you share in the accomplishment just as you shared in the work to get me there.
Much bigger than all of my judging achievements though, is our friendship. More than just a mentor, you serve as a confidant, a sounding board, a safe place to vent, and a smile when I need cheering. We talked about everything (pretty much literally everything) from the deeply personal to the mundane to the comical and theoretical, and you are always there to listen and share your thoughts. As you said, "lol, I seriously doubt at this point that leaving the program would make either of stop talking to the other."
To my judge mentor:
The time and effort that you have invested in me as a judge surpasses anything I could have ever imagined. From our first tentative talks where you told me to bring my husband along, our relationship has come a long way.
After I failed my first L1, you never let me stop working and learning. You dragged me through the intricacies of combat, first strike, double strike, protection, and trample. You encouraged me to keep applying to events, keep studying, and keep asking questions. (You even answered all those questions!) And above all, you repeated the mantra, "You ARE a judge." enough times that I actually started to believe it.
I could not have survived the stressful days leading up to my second L1 test without you. When I was in tears, you encouraged me. When I wanted to quit, you said you hoped I didn't. When I almost decided not to show up, the thought of disappointing you made me keep going. Somehow I dragged myself to that judge conference and took that test. And then, Nate wouldn't tell me how I did. I saw you at lunch, where I was far too nervous to eat, and you acted like you didn't know anything. After lunch you led me to that tiny room, silently closed the door, and solemnly told me to sit down. I think I can honestly say that is the most nervous I have ever been in my life. When you said, "I want to be the first person to congratulate you on becoming a judge" I just about fainted. Anger. Fear. Relief. And somewhere the insane thought that you had lied to me before about being a judge before passing the test.
Since that day you have continued to answer my innumerable questions (1 at a time) and never seem to tire of reiterating the details I yearn to understand. You have shared your wisdom as a judge and as Area Captain, even letting me help plan a local judge meet-up. You don't mind explaining things to me, including the how, and the why. The depth of our conversations helps me add the details to my skills that give polish to my work.
As I approached L2, your attitude towards my advancement shifted. You became distant and never encouraged me to test. You said that I would know when I was ready. You suggested that I not rush things. I took your hesitation as a sign that I was unprepared. I put off testing because I awaited your approval.
When we finally first worked together at Star City, you nearly made me laugh when you called me an experienced member of our team. It took some time to sink in that you were right. Those words took on a new meaning throughout the day as I realized that things were coming together and I felt confident on the floor delivering rulings, passing out slips, helping players, and flipping rounds. While working with you I realized how similarly we approach things and can see your influence in my 'style' of judging. I'm proud that I take after my mentor.
After that, I felt more ready to move forward, but still lacked your explicit statement of my readiness. My test came as a surprise, even to me! After I passed, I only wanted to tell 1 person - YOU. I needed some time to let that achievement sink in, but I couldn't wait to share it with you because you share in the accomplishment just as you shared in the work to get me there.
Much bigger than all of my judging achievements though, is our friendship. More than just a mentor, you serve as a confidant, a sounding board, a safe place to vent, and a smile when I need cheering. We talked about everything (pretty much literally everything) from the deeply personal to the mundane to the comical and theoretical, and you are always there to listen and share your thoughts. As you said, "lol, I seriously doubt at this point that leaving the program would make either of stop talking to the other."
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
Stepping into a New World
As I pulled into the parking lot, I looked at the manicured gardens, the inviting patio, and the buildings set behind a beautiful stone bridge and decided that I must be in the wrong place. This enchanting location couldn't be Pat’s Games, a Magic shop in Austin, TX. Then JD Smith, a judge friend from Dreamhack and the other floor judge for this event, walked towards my car waving. I parked and hopped out looking around in awe. JD quickly introduced me to Jim, and Jim started explaining the names for the different parts of the store I had absolutely no idea what he was talking about. I could do little more than stare in wonder at the picturesque setting that rapidly filled with the usual t-shirt wearing, backpack-toting Magic player crowd. We moved to sit in comfortable office chairs around a folding table on a pretty raised patio overlooking the area and chatted pleasantly.
Head Judge David Hibbs arrived soon thereafter, and led us into a portion of the shop called The Castle. It turned out to be a mostly regular Magic shop, with a few cool additions. The walls boasted beautiful murals and artwork in addition to the normal posters and goodies from previous sets and pre-releases. A large red sofa occupied a prominent position and an adorable dog perched on the end of it for passers-by to pet. Behind the counter a dizzying array of well-organized Magic cards and products filled large open racks, while at the tables sat players in various states of filling out decklists. JD and I copied David dropping our bags behind the counter and congregating at a nearby table. Pat, the owner, introduced herself and offered us breakfast tacos. Jim, who turned out to be an employee, pointed out various drinks and snacks available to us. Logan, the scorekeeper, happily greeted players, entered them into WER, and handed them each a decklist.
David invited us to join him outside saying, "Smart judges sit down when they can." Our judge meeting took place at a cute patio table as we relaxed under the pergola. It felt funny to hear the usual stuff about Game Losses, tardiness times, and backups at a table more fit for having tea, but it constituted a good kind of different. The whole place had an air of tranquility that suggested enjoying the experience as much as the result.
David's laid back attitude fit perfectly with the setting. He expected things to go well, expected JD and I to perform well, and didn't need to encourage, threaten, or admonish like some leaders. He simply did his job while we did ours. And not surprisingly, things went well.
We slipped back inside to pick up pairings and cut slips before returning to the main patio for an outdoor player meeting. David stood on a small brick step and spoke loudly to the assembled players. His red USA-South regional polo stood out against the grey ones JD and I sported as he introduced us. He explained the usual information about tardiness, Competitive REL, and calling a judge, but added that tables in the Clubhouse building would be numbered 123-130, however those would correspond to table numbers 23-30 on the pairings sheets. While he spoke, JD hung the pairings on a wooden post behind the gathered players.
Due to the multi-building setup, David opted to have decklists collected after players sat for the first round. JD picked up the ones from the Clubhouse while David took tables 9-22 on one side of The Castle, and I rounded the couch to collect from tables 1-8 on the other side. David and JD handed me their piles, and while round 1 began, I set to work alphabetizing them. I discovered 3 no-names, so I took the alphabetical player list and began my detective work. One list had the 'deck designer' listed as 'Tim Brown,' but the player's last initial filled in as an H. *sigh* After confirming with the 3 no-names that I had correctly identified their lists, I went in search of the last missing decklist. The player at table 13 quickly apologized and handed it over when I approached him. I slid the neat pile into the accordion file and headed onto the floor to watch some Magic.
My first call came almost immediately. Jim, the store employee, called me to table 2 where he explained that he drew a card from his opponent's library. I noted his black sleeves and his opponent's green ones as I looked at their libraries stacked side-by-side. He elaborated that on his draw for turn he had simply reached to the wrong pile. His opponent confirmed the story. Looking at Extra Cards (LEC) sprang to my brain. I asked the opponent if he knew the position of any cards in his library. He explained that he had just fetched so no cards were known, except that he had seen the card Jim drew. Since it was an odd situation I quickly conferred with David who agreed with my ruling and fix. I returned to the table and issued the GPE-LEC Warning and had the opponent shuffle.
The rest of the round progressed smoothly and ended early. As round 2 opened, David asked me to swoop table 12 for a deck check. I passed out slips, careful to note the names of the players at table 12, then busied myself at the deck check station right behind them while waiting for them to present. As soon as I saw the 2 decks in the middle of the battlefield, I stopped them just before they reached for each other's decks and informed them of the deck check. Nerves threatened my first ever swoop, but I handled it well. I asked each player's name and placed player 1's deckbox in my hand with the slip (Thanks Adena for the tip!) so that I would not mix them up.
I bustled back to the station and handed David a box as I pulled the decklists from the accordion file. He went to work sorting his deck to check it in the traditional way, while I employed the Polish method of checking the deck by flipping over each card and tallying it on the decklist without changing the order of the deck. Despite the fact that David took a brief judge call during the check, we finished quickly and both decks passed. I returned the decks to the players with instructions to shuffle thoroughly and added an eigtht-minute time extension to their match slip.
On my next judge call, Albert played a Snapcaster Mage, and asked if he could pay the Phyrexian mana cost to cast a Gitaxian Probe using the flashback ability. I surprised myself by quickly answering yes and explaining that the Phyrexian mana cost could still be paid either with {U} or with 2 life. My own surety and confidence felt odd, as it replaced my usual feelings of self-doubt and anxiety.
Another fun call: Adonis called a judge because he wanted to cast Engineered Explosives while Noel controlled a Thalia, making his non-creature spells cost one more to cast. Adonis inquired if the {1} he paid for Thalia's ability still counted towards the number of colors for the Sunburst ability. I assured him that it does, again confidently knowing the answer without the nagging doubts.
During the round, David pulled me aside and inquired about my deck check method. He revealed his preference for the traditional method, but instructed me to do whichever I could do the fastest. Since a judge I often work with requests the Polish method, I have much more practice with it, but I certainly wanted to adhere to the Head Judge's directive as well. I decided to give the traditional method a try for the next round.
As an interesting caveat to this event, players could move their matches each round. As I passed out slips, players would wait at their table, then take the slip and go play on the patio, in another room, or wherever they chose. David noted in his opening announcement that this practice would be acceptable as long as they informed a judge prior to moving. When players let me know, I noted their table number and new location in a small notebook for later reference.
Table 4 came up on the die David rolled to select our round 3 deck check. Well, table 4 had a player in the restroom, so he instructed me to take table 5. Seeing no one at that table, I checked my notes and sure enough, they had moved their match outside. I let David know, and he pointed at 6. Finally, a table with two players presenting decks! I moved to grab them as the players began to draw opening hands, and was quick enough to avoid the players actually getting any cards. While we checked the decks, I noted the sleeves were a bit worn and seemed to be marked with sticky globs of dirt. David took a look and showed me that the dirt clods are easily correctible and therefore not a concern, but that the uneven wear made frequently manipulated cards easy to identify. Since no clear advantage could be gained from it, he had me issue Aric a TE:Marked Cards Warning and ask him to resleeve after the round. While he appeared none too happy, Aric politely accepted the warning and nine-minute time extension.
About halfway through the round, a spectator hurried up to me and asked me to come to a table where he had paused a match. He informed me that both players had cast noncreature spells and that neither had paid the {1} extra for Thalia. Arthur explained that he had just cast Terminus for its miracle cost and that he did not think he had to pay the extra mana due to the alternative cost. Nick chimed in that he only plays Thalia in his sideboard and had forgotten to pay it for his spell as well. I quickly realized that this complicated situation would require a backup and went to inform David. I double checked with him that the {1} extra did indeed apply to the miracle cost and we he replied that it did I let him know that he was needed to resolve the situation. After he spoke with both players he had them each simply pay the additional mana since both players had it available. As we left the table, David told me to give them each a single GRV.
Towards the end of the round, I hung out near table 6, the only table still playing in that section of The Castle, and overheard Aric say, "We got screwed by the judges." He elaborated that they should have received a fifteen minute time extension after their deck check. His opponent pointed out that I stood directly behind him. His glance back at me revealed a face that suggested perhaps his comment wasn't the brightest idea. I opted not to intervene at that point since I did not want to further delay the match. What I should have done is spoken to the player later and let him know that he could have spoken up when I issued the extension if he believed it to be incorrect. Looking back, I wish I had handled that better, but I'm glad that I did not overreact.
After table 6 finished up with a few minutes left on their time extension, I handed the scorekeeper the slip saying, that's the last one." His replied that table 7 was still out. I looked at the empty table 7, and then it hit me. I flipped open my notebook to see 7-clubhouse. I informed David then scurried across the bridge and up the ramp, quickly pulling open the door to the back room of the clubhouse. There sat table 7 unaware that time had been called 9 minutes ago. Luckily they finished up as I approached them and quickly signed and handed me the slip. I made a mental note to do a quick end-of-round check for the rest of the day.
During a nice quiet lull in round 4, David called me to him away from the players. With no fanfare he stated, "Some people like Noonies enjoy giving daggers to candidates, but I like to just have people explain things to me. So can you tell me the steps to casting a spell?" I fought back the panic - he had given me no indication all day that he had any knowledge or interest in me as a judge beyond my position for the day. I guess all judges have their ways of putting a candidate on the spot. (Also thanks to David Carroll right here. He had made me memorize and write the steps to casting a spell. His grillings prepared me for this moment.) While my mind raced, at least a shred of my memory remained and I got the first step - announce the spell and put it on the stack - out of my mouth. I slowly, clumsily managed to regurgitate the rest of the steps. David seemed mostly satisfied, but he asked for more detail, which I was unable to provide. Embarrassment clouded my thoughts and I wished that I had studied more. Luckily his next question focused on layers, which I nailed. He then moved on to static effects, where I failed miserably. He concluded our conversation by saying that he thought I knew more than many newer L1s, but that I needed to incorporate more detail. I secretly added that I was proud of surviving the conversation without wetting my pants. It wasn’t the first time an L3 had put me on that spot verbally like that with no warning, and I'm sure it won't be the last. After each experience, I refine my skills in both understanding the rules and policies and in conveying those understandings clearly and accurately. I'm also committed that next time, I'll answer more thoroughly.
By round 5, enough players had dropped that all the matches started out in The Castle, so all three judges remained in the same room. JD covered the floor while David and I enjoyed delicious sandwiches from a small shop nearby. After finishing lunch, I casually watched some Magic when Jim answered a call on the store phone. He then called out that it was a phone-in judge call. It took him telling me the second time to realize what he was saying: a match that moved to The Clubhouse had called in requesting a judge. Then he nudged me and said to head over there. I flew out the door, flustered that I had had to be told three times before understanding the situation. When I arrived at The Clubhouse, the players awaited me, seemingly not noticing the oddity that they had used a telephone to procure a judge.
Anson showed me a Dimir Charm, which he had cast on Neil's Monastery Mentor, choosing to 'destroy target creature with power 2 or less.' In response Neil had cast Brainstorm triggering prowess. I breathed an inward sigh of relief that I knew the answer to the question he was about to ask. Then Anson asked, "So since it won't kill that guy anymore, can I choose a different target?" I almost laughed; not the question I expected! I felt a little bit bad explaining to him that his spell would be countered by the rules of the game since it no longer had a legal target, and that he could not change the target.
As most players do, he respectfully accepted my answer and thanked me. As a newer judge I had really expected a lot more resistance from players when rulings don't go in their favor. In fact, I have experienced quite the opposite! Players seem genuinely interested in understanding the game and playing it correctly; they just don't know the rules or understand how to apply them. As a judge I provide education and customer service to allow them to play and enjoy their game. It's a great fit for my personality, and as my rules knowledge improves, my skills as a judge will continue to grow.
Later, I took a call from Abby regarding a Flickerwisp. She asked if it would return immediately since it was cast during an end step. I glanced briefly at the card before explaining that it would be returned at the beginning of the next end step. I made the ruling confidently remembering receiving the same call the week before. Unfortunately at the previous event I had gotten it wrong, then looked up the Oracle text for the card and changed my ruling. This time, I knew it. Unfortunately my ruling was unclear to the players because the Flickerwisp in question was from the Eventide set and did not have the errata text on it. As I left the table David simply held up his phone showing me the Oracle text. The realization crashed down on me that I should have showed that to the player to clarify the situation. I appreciated David's subtle yet effective way to point out my mistake and show me how to do it better. No words needed.
As the 6th and final round began, David asked me to hang out near the top tables and listen for any sketchy conversations. He passed out the slips as I lingered nearby. Table 1 quickly decided to ID, as did table 2. However, table 2 accidentally filled out table 3's slip. With the table space limited, at least one match had been relocating each round so the table numbers were set oddly making the mistake difficult to catch. While table 2 handed me the slip, table 3 could not find theirs and needed it since they wanted to go outside. I caught the table 2 players and had them complete the correct slip while I noted on table 3's slip that it was not an ID. I asked table 3 to give their slip directly to me at the end of the round so that I could ensure that the scorekeeper understood the mess. Table 3 then went outside, but returned a short time later saying that they had decided to ID as well. Allowing them to reach that conclusion outside felt suspect, but since it had been the policy all day to allow relocation, David and I agreed that nothing could be done about it.
The round went smoothly and ended just before 4:00. Wow! We just ran 6 rounds in under 6 hours. David guided the players through a prize split vote, and they opted to split. So we were done! There was never any mention of hurrying or slow play, we simply did our jobs efficiently, and the players did, too. My leadership lesson for the day: expect excellence. (Don't demand it.)
During the round Abby approached me and asked about being a judge. I gave her my standard spiel about setting up a Judge Center account and taking a practice test. I then gave her my contact info. (This allows an interested candidate to explore the process as well as puts the responsibility on them to contact me if they want to pursue the idea. Most never do.) The difference between this and most of these impromptu chats was the way she asked, "Could I test with you?" while looking at the other judges with a skeptical eye. I generally abhor being seen as a 'female judge,' however this instance caused me to ponder. As a hopefully soon-to-be L2, perhaps I could offer more to the program by offering female players a role model of sorts.
While the players were collecting their prize money, David turned to me and said, "I didn't think we'd have time for any testing today, but we're done early. I know they want to close up here, but if you want to follow me back to my house, you can take your L2 today." Floored. I had come to the event expecting to get to know David with the hope that if things went well maybe asking him to possibly test me some time in the future. The abstract just became concrete. I asked him for a few minutes to consider. My judge mentor Josh had said that I would know when I was ready. David Carroll and other judge friends had been encouraging me to test, but all of them had said that the readiness had to be my decision.
As I reflected on my day, I felt the fundamental shift. My calls had gone well, and I hadn't made any major mistakes. My confidence had increased as had my comfort level on the floor. I had taken on new tasks (a swoop!), learned new things, and worked with new people - and it felt good. My conversation with David had gone well enough that he believed me to be ready enough to test. My mind raced through thoughts of passing and of failing, and I knew that I could live with either outcome.
David and I talked about my last L2P. I scored an unimpressive 72, but studied a lot in the month since then. I also do better on paper than on the computerized practice tests. JD and Pat overheard and both encouraged me to do it. David stopped them saying something about not wanting to pressure me. I felt oddly encouraged by the level of respect for me that he showed with that comment. I considered the opportunity as a whole: I was already in Austin and would not have to make another trip, I could test in the privacy of his home, which is far less stressful for me than at a big event, and really, I was ready. Some part of me had secretly hoped for the opportunity to present itself, I just didn't anticipate it coming so soon. Realizing that I should take advantage of the situation that I worked so hard to create for myself, I made up my mind to do it.
I took a deep breath, tried not to look terrified, and told David that if I could use a half hour or so to study, then I would be ready to test. Pat offered to let us stay in the store, but David explained how long the test takes. He did ask to use her printer since the 50 questions cover a lot of paper. Seeing those pages in his hand make me feel ill. My fate had already been decided - I just didn't yet know what it would be. JD wished me good luck and I promised to let him know how it turned out.
Climbing into my car, I was almost too nervous to drive. I called my husband and tried to calm my frantic nerves as I drove. I requested that he text me a copy of my study sheet, which I had neglected to bring, so I could review it. I followed David mindlessly, paying no attention to where we were going and until he parked his car. I lost track of time. I opted not to tell anyone that I was testing so that I could test and process the results myself before handling the social interactions. I felt a twinge of regret at not telling the guys who had mentored me, but that time had passed anyway and David waited on his porch.
I grabbed my backpack and followed him into a beautiful spacious home. He introduced me to his family before taking me upstairs to settle on a comfortable sofa. I opted to change into my shorts and McCurley's Minions t-shirt and then got to work writing and rewriting my notes sheet. David Carroll had taught me to write out the steps to casting a spell, layers, replacement effects, and basically the entire IPG and then use those notes on the exam. I reread a few passages in the CR and packed everything into my backpack. I headed downstairs in search of David and found him reading through my test.
He took me back to the table upstairs in his amazingly well-stocked Magic loft and gave me his standard instruction spiel, a pile of basic lands, and the thick stack of paper which comprised the test. I set it aside, took up a sheet of blank paper and wrote out my notes sheet confidently. Then I took a deep breath and read the first question. Great - a question about an enchanted land getting copied. These are literally my worst question type. Layers and lands - yuck. The feeling of defeat threatened to overtake me. I chose an answer, wrote a question mark to remind me to come back to it later and moved on.
As I proceeded through the questions, his sweet cat joined me on the couch. Petting a stress-relieving purring ball of fun can make anything less stressful. While I panicked on a few early questions, it did seem to get easier. Around number 14 David came upstairs to check on me and invite me to join his family for dinner. While the barbecue smelled delicious, I didn't want to lose my focus, so I regretfully declined and kept working.
At the halfway mark, I set the test aside, got up for a stretch and a restroom break. When I returned, David was standing there checking on me again. While he seemed sweet and kind, he made me nervous too. I made a mental note that testing at a home is so much less scary than testing at a big event with lots of people around!
I settled back in to finish the test, although I did have a brief break when a cat curled up on my paper. I answered each question then marked whether I considered it complete or wanted to give it another look later. When I got to the policy section at the end, I relaxed. I'm much better at policy than CR. Thankfully may pace picked up too. My brain felt fried.
After completing my first trip through the test, I took another brief break then fought the temptation to just call it done. I forced myself to go back to each question I had marked and review the answer if needed as I transferred my selections to the answer document.
Question 23 stumped me. I had no idea of the rule that applied. So I elected to use what I knew of the game and selected the answer that seemed right. I couldn't justify it really, but it was more of a gut feeling. I could hear Carter's voice in my head saying, "What makes sense?" just as he had when I had asked him for advice on scenarios while studying. I had gone with that on several questions, but this one seemed the most difficult.
I completed the bubbling, stacked my papers neatly then took a few minutes to mentally debrief myself. I realized that either way it turned out, I would know where I stood as far as my knowledge. I surprisingly felt like I did well. That fact scared me a little bit. I feared that I had lulled myself into a false state of feeling competent.
Before I had a chance to go get David, he appeared and noted the stacked papers. He quickly went to work checking my answers, starting with marking #1 wrong. After the first column, I mentally calculated how badly I failed if the pattern continued, but luckily my mistakes seemed to dry up. In fact, I didn't miss a single question in the final column, where the policy questions resided. After calculating the total, the surprise of my well-above passing score registered in my head. The shock left me feeling anxious.
David joined me on the couch and offered to go over any questions I had missed. I asked if he would go over the ones I got right, but was unsure of as well, to which he readily agreed. We walked through the test discussing each question. Number 23's correct answer pleased me, and David detailed why it worked that way. My pleasure increased with the knowledge that my reasoning was correct in addition to my answer selection.
After we finished the debrief, David congratulated me and said, "Now come downstairs and have some dinner." I hesitantly followed him, fearful of imposing on his family time. His wife graciously welcomed me and I joined his son at the table. I enjoyed a delicious meal and wonderful company. Then I got to meet his amazingly cool pet spiders. He and his son enjoyed telling me about each one’s breed and feeding habits. I really wanted to ask a million questions and hang out longer, but the long drive home loomed ahead of me.
In the car, I texted Josh, my judge mentor, and let him know I passed. He replied, "I am stupid proud of you." Then he said, "Did you plan to test?" to which I responded, "Not exactly." I also let my husband know of my passing score.
Then I spent 3 hours on the road ruminating on my crazy day. I began the day as an anxious L1 feeling lost and out of place at a new store, with a new Head Judge, and completely unsure of myself. By then end of the day I felt like I had grown into a confident L2 ready to take on my next challenge.
It's not often I say this, but I'm proud of my work and my accomplishments that day.
And as usual, I have a list of thank you's to go along with it. To my sweet mom and my wonderful husband for watching our kids and making the trip possible. To my sister Lacey for letting me crash at her place at the last minute and for the wonderful dinner Saturday night. To my judge mentor Josh McCurley for answering my questions and being there to talk about everything. To David Carroll for long nights of studying - you are a demanding teacher, but very effective. To Adena Chernosky for writing the steps to cast a spell on sticky notes for me to practice putting in order. To Joe Klopchic for showing me the L3 qualities and honestly evaluating where I stand. To Carter for teaching me to think through the philosophy behind the rules. And to every judge who I have worked with along the way.
Head Judge David Hibbs arrived soon thereafter, and led us into a portion of the shop called The Castle. It turned out to be a mostly regular Magic shop, with a few cool additions. The walls boasted beautiful murals and artwork in addition to the normal posters and goodies from previous sets and pre-releases. A large red sofa occupied a prominent position and an adorable dog perched on the end of it for passers-by to pet. Behind the counter a dizzying array of well-organized Magic cards and products filled large open racks, while at the tables sat players in various states of filling out decklists. JD and I copied David dropping our bags behind the counter and congregating at a nearby table. Pat, the owner, introduced herself and offered us breakfast tacos. Jim, who turned out to be an employee, pointed out various drinks and snacks available to us. Logan, the scorekeeper, happily greeted players, entered them into WER, and handed them each a decklist.
David invited us to join him outside saying, "Smart judges sit down when they can." Our judge meeting took place at a cute patio table as we relaxed under the pergola. It felt funny to hear the usual stuff about Game Losses, tardiness times, and backups at a table more fit for having tea, but it constituted a good kind of different. The whole place had an air of tranquility that suggested enjoying the experience as much as the result.
David's laid back attitude fit perfectly with the setting. He expected things to go well, expected JD and I to perform well, and didn't need to encourage, threaten, or admonish like some leaders. He simply did his job while we did ours. And not surprisingly, things went well.
We slipped back inside to pick up pairings and cut slips before returning to the main patio for an outdoor player meeting. David stood on a small brick step and spoke loudly to the assembled players. His red USA-South regional polo stood out against the grey ones JD and I sported as he introduced us. He explained the usual information about tardiness, Competitive REL, and calling a judge, but added that tables in the Clubhouse building would be numbered 123-130, however those would correspond to table numbers 23-30 on the pairings sheets. While he spoke, JD hung the pairings on a wooden post behind the gathered players.
Due to the multi-building setup, David opted to have decklists collected after players sat for the first round. JD picked up the ones from the Clubhouse while David took tables 9-22 on one side of The Castle, and I rounded the couch to collect from tables 1-8 on the other side. David and JD handed me their piles, and while round 1 began, I set to work alphabetizing them. I discovered 3 no-names, so I took the alphabetical player list and began my detective work. One list had the 'deck designer' listed as 'Tim Brown,' but the player's last initial filled in as an H. *sigh* After confirming with the 3 no-names that I had correctly identified their lists, I went in search of the last missing decklist. The player at table 13 quickly apologized and handed it over when I approached him. I slid the neat pile into the accordion file and headed onto the floor to watch some Magic.
My first call came almost immediately. Jim, the store employee, called me to table 2 where he explained that he drew a card from his opponent's library. I noted his black sleeves and his opponent's green ones as I looked at their libraries stacked side-by-side. He elaborated that on his draw for turn he had simply reached to the wrong pile. His opponent confirmed the story. Looking at Extra Cards (LEC) sprang to my brain. I asked the opponent if he knew the position of any cards in his library. He explained that he had just fetched so no cards were known, except that he had seen the card Jim drew. Since it was an odd situation I quickly conferred with David who agreed with my ruling and fix. I returned to the table and issued the GPE-LEC Warning and had the opponent shuffle.
The rest of the round progressed smoothly and ended early. As round 2 opened, David asked me to swoop table 12 for a deck check. I passed out slips, careful to note the names of the players at table 12, then busied myself at the deck check station right behind them while waiting for them to present. As soon as I saw the 2 decks in the middle of the battlefield, I stopped them just before they reached for each other's decks and informed them of the deck check. Nerves threatened my first ever swoop, but I handled it well. I asked each player's name and placed player 1's deckbox in my hand with the slip (Thanks Adena for the tip!) so that I would not mix them up.
I bustled back to the station and handed David a box as I pulled the decklists from the accordion file. He went to work sorting his deck to check it in the traditional way, while I employed the Polish method of checking the deck by flipping over each card and tallying it on the decklist without changing the order of the deck. Despite the fact that David took a brief judge call during the check, we finished quickly and both decks passed. I returned the decks to the players with instructions to shuffle thoroughly and added an eigtht-minute time extension to their match slip.
On my next judge call, Albert played a Snapcaster Mage, and asked if he could pay the Phyrexian mana cost to cast a Gitaxian Probe using the flashback ability. I surprised myself by quickly answering yes and explaining that the Phyrexian mana cost could still be paid either with {U} or with 2 life. My own surety and confidence felt odd, as it replaced my usual feelings of self-doubt and anxiety.
Another fun call: Adonis called a judge because he wanted to cast Engineered Explosives while Noel controlled a Thalia, making his non-creature spells cost one more to cast. Adonis inquired if the {1} he paid for Thalia's ability still counted towards the number of colors for the Sunburst ability. I assured him that it does, again confidently knowing the answer without the nagging doubts.
During the round, David pulled me aside and inquired about my deck check method. He revealed his preference for the traditional method, but instructed me to do whichever I could do the fastest. Since a judge I often work with requests the Polish method, I have much more practice with it, but I certainly wanted to adhere to the Head Judge's directive as well. I decided to give the traditional method a try for the next round.
As an interesting caveat to this event, players could move their matches each round. As I passed out slips, players would wait at their table, then take the slip and go play on the patio, in another room, or wherever they chose. David noted in his opening announcement that this practice would be acceptable as long as they informed a judge prior to moving. When players let me know, I noted their table number and new location in a small notebook for later reference.
Table 4 came up on the die David rolled to select our round 3 deck check. Well, table 4 had a player in the restroom, so he instructed me to take table 5. Seeing no one at that table, I checked my notes and sure enough, they had moved their match outside. I let David know, and he pointed at 6. Finally, a table with two players presenting decks! I moved to grab them as the players began to draw opening hands, and was quick enough to avoid the players actually getting any cards. While we checked the decks, I noted the sleeves were a bit worn and seemed to be marked with sticky globs of dirt. David took a look and showed me that the dirt clods are easily correctible and therefore not a concern, but that the uneven wear made frequently manipulated cards easy to identify. Since no clear advantage could be gained from it, he had me issue Aric a TE:Marked Cards Warning and ask him to resleeve after the round. While he appeared none too happy, Aric politely accepted the warning and nine-minute time extension.
About halfway through the round, a spectator hurried up to me and asked me to come to a table where he had paused a match. He informed me that both players had cast noncreature spells and that neither had paid the {1} extra for Thalia. Arthur explained that he had just cast Terminus for its miracle cost and that he did not think he had to pay the extra mana due to the alternative cost. Nick chimed in that he only plays Thalia in his sideboard and had forgotten to pay it for his spell as well. I quickly realized that this complicated situation would require a backup and went to inform David. I double checked with him that the {1} extra did indeed apply to the miracle cost and we he replied that it did I let him know that he was needed to resolve the situation. After he spoke with both players he had them each simply pay the additional mana since both players had it available. As we left the table, David told me to give them each a single GRV.
Towards the end of the round, I hung out near table 6, the only table still playing in that section of The Castle, and overheard Aric say, "We got screwed by the judges." He elaborated that they should have received a fifteen minute time extension after their deck check. His opponent pointed out that I stood directly behind him. His glance back at me revealed a face that suggested perhaps his comment wasn't the brightest idea. I opted not to intervene at that point since I did not want to further delay the match. What I should have done is spoken to the player later and let him know that he could have spoken up when I issued the extension if he believed it to be incorrect. Looking back, I wish I had handled that better, but I'm glad that I did not overreact.
After table 6 finished up with a few minutes left on their time extension, I handed the scorekeeper the slip saying, that's the last one." His replied that table 7 was still out. I looked at the empty table 7, and then it hit me. I flipped open my notebook to see 7-clubhouse. I informed David then scurried across the bridge and up the ramp, quickly pulling open the door to the back room of the clubhouse. There sat table 7 unaware that time had been called 9 minutes ago. Luckily they finished up as I approached them and quickly signed and handed me the slip. I made a mental note to do a quick end-of-round check for the rest of the day.
During a nice quiet lull in round 4, David called me to him away from the players. With no fanfare he stated, "Some people like Noonies enjoy giving daggers to candidates, but I like to just have people explain things to me. So can you tell me the steps to casting a spell?" I fought back the panic - he had given me no indication all day that he had any knowledge or interest in me as a judge beyond my position for the day. I guess all judges have their ways of putting a candidate on the spot. (Also thanks to David Carroll right here. He had made me memorize and write the steps to casting a spell. His grillings prepared me for this moment.) While my mind raced, at least a shred of my memory remained and I got the first step - announce the spell and put it on the stack - out of my mouth. I slowly, clumsily managed to regurgitate the rest of the steps. David seemed mostly satisfied, but he asked for more detail, which I was unable to provide. Embarrassment clouded my thoughts and I wished that I had studied more. Luckily his next question focused on layers, which I nailed. He then moved on to static effects, where I failed miserably. He concluded our conversation by saying that he thought I knew more than many newer L1s, but that I needed to incorporate more detail. I secretly added that I was proud of surviving the conversation without wetting my pants. It wasn’t the first time an L3 had put me on that spot verbally like that with no warning, and I'm sure it won't be the last. After each experience, I refine my skills in both understanding the rules and policies and in conveying those understandings clearly and accurately. I'm also committed that next time, I'll answer more thoroughly.
By round 5, enough players had dropped that all the matches started out in The Castle, so all three judges remained in the same room. JD covered the floor while David and I enjoyed delicious sandwiches from a small shop nearby. After finishing lunch, I casually watched some Magic when Jim answered a call on the store phone. He then called out that it was a phone-in judge call. It took him telling me the second time to realize what he was saying: a match that moved to The Clubhouse had called in requesting a judge. Then he nudged me and said to head over there. I flew out the door, flustered that I had had to be told three times before understanding the situation. When I arrived at The Clubhouse, the players awaited me, seemingly not noticing the oddity that they had used a telephone to procure a judge.
Anson showed me a Dimir Charm, which he had cast on Neil's Monastery Mentor, choosing to 'destroy target creature with power 2 or less.' In response Neil had cast Brainstorm triggering prowess. I breathed an inward sigh of relief that I knew the answer to the question he was about to ask. Then Anson asked, "So since it won't kill that guy anymore, can I choose a different target?" I almost laughed; not the question I expected! I felt a little bit bad explaining to him that his spell would be countered by the rules of the game since it no longer had a legal target, and that he could not change the target.
As most players do, he respectfully accepted my answer and thanked me. As a newer judge I had really expected a lot more resistance from players when rulings don't go in their favor. In fact, I have experienced quite the opposite! Players seem genuinely interested in understanding the game and playing it correctly; they just don't know the rules or understand how to apply them. As a judge I provide education and customer service to allow them to play and enjoy their game. It's a great fit for my personality, and as my rules knowledge improves, my skills as a judge will continue to grow.
Later, I took a call from Abby regarding a Flickerwisp. She asked if it would return immediately since it was cast during an end step. I glanced briefly at the card before explaining that it would be returned at the beginning of the next end step. I made the ruling confidently remembering receiving the same call the week before. Unfortunately at the previous event I had gotten it wrong, then looked up the Oracle text for the card and changed my ruling. This time, I knew it. Unfortunately my ruling was unclear to the players because the Flickerwisp in question was from the Eventide set and did not have the errata text on it. As I left the table David simply held up his phone showing me the Oracle text. The realization crashed down on me that I should have showed that to the player to clarify the situation. I appreciated David's subtle yet effective way to point out my mistake and show me how to do it better. No words needed.
As the 6th and final round began, David asked me to hang out near the top tables and listen for any sketchy conversations. He passed out the slips as I lingered nearby. Table 1 quickly decided to ID, as did table 2. However, table 2 accidentally filled out table 3's slip. With the table space limited, at least one match had been relocating each round so the table numbers were set oddly making the mistake difficult to catch. While table 2 handed me the slip, table 3 could not find theirs and needed it since they wanted to go outside. I caught the table 2 players and had them complete the correct slip while I noted on table 3's slip that it was not an ID. I asked table 3 to give their slip directly to me at the end of the round so that I could ensure that the scorekeeper understood the mess. Table 3 then went outside, but returned a short time later saying that they had decided to ID as well. Allowing them to reach that conclusion outside felt suspect, but since it had been the policy all day to allow relocation, David and I agreed that nothing could be done about it.
The round went smoothly and ended just before 4:00. Wow! We just ran 6 rounds in under 6 hours. David guided the players through a prize split vote, and they opted to split. So we were done! There was never any mention of hurrying or slow play, we simply did our jobs efficiently, and the players did, too. My leadership lesson for the day: expect excellence. (Don't demand it.)
During the round Abby approached me and asked about being a judge. I gave her my standard spiel about setting up a Judge Center account and taking a practice test. I then gave her my contact info. (This allows an interested candidate to explore the process as well as puts the responsibility on them to contact me if they want to pursue the idea. Most never do.) The difference between this and most of these impromptu chats was the way she asked, "Could I test with you?" while looking at the other judges with a skeptical eye. I generally abhor being seen as a 'female judge,' however this instance caused me to ponder. As a hopefully soon-to-be L2, perhaps I could offer more to the program by offering female players a role model of sorts.
While the players were collecting their prize money, David turned to me and said, "I didn't think we'd have time for any testing today, but we're done early. I know they want to close up here, but if you want to follow me back to my house, you can take your L2 today." Floored. I had come to the event expecting to get to know David with the hope that if things went well maybe asking him to possibly test me some time in the future. The abstract just became concrete. I asked him for a few minutes to consider. My judge mentor Josh had said that I would know when I was ready. David Carroll and other judge friends had been encouraging me to test, but all of them had said that the readiness had to be my decision.
As I reflected on my day, I felt the fundamental shift. My calls had gone well, and I hadn't made any major mistakes. My confidence had increased as had my comfort level on the floor. I had taken on new tasks (a swoop!), learned new things, and worked with new people - and it felt good. My conversation with David had gone well enough that he believed me to be ready enough to test. My mind raced through thoughts of passing and of failing, and I knew that I could live with either outcome.
David and I talked about my last L2P. I scored an unimpressive 72, but studied a lot in the month since then. I also do better on paper than on the computerized practice tests. JD and Pat overheard and both encouraged me to do it. David stopped them saying something about not wanting to pressure me. I felt oddly encouraged by the level of respect for me that he showed with that comment. I considered the opportunity as a whole: I was already in Austin and would not have to make another trip, I could test in the privacy of his home, which is far less stressful for me than at a big event, and really, I was ready. Some part of me had secretly hoped for the opportunity to present itself, I just didn't anticipate it coming so soon. Realizing that I should take advantage of the situation that I worked so hard to create for myself, I made up my mind to do it.
I took a deep breath, tried not to look terrified, and told David that if I could use a half hour or so to study, then I would be ready to test. Pat offered to let us stay in the store, but David explained how long the test takes. He did ask to use her printer since the 50 questions cover a lot of paper. Seeing those pages in his hand make me feel ill. My fate had already been decided - I just didn't yet know what it would be. JD wished me good luck and I promised to let him know how it turned out.
Climbing into my car, I was almost too nervous to drive. I called my husband and tried to calm my frantic nerves as I drove. I requested that he text me a copy of my study sheet, which I had neglected to bring, so I could review it. I followed David mindlessly, paying no attention to where we were going and until he parked his car. I lost track of time. I opted not to tell anyone that I was testing so that I could test and process the results myself before handling the social interactions. I felt a twinge of regret at not telling the guys who had mentored me, but that time had passed anyway and David waited on his porch.
I grabbed my backpack and followed him into a beautiful spacious home. He introduced me to his family before taking me upstairs to settle on a comfortable sofa. I opted to change into my shorts and McCurley's Minions t-shirt and then got to work writing and rewriting my notes sheet. David Carroll had taught me to write out the steps to casting a spell, layers, replacement effects, and basically the entire IPG and then use those notes on the exam. I reread a few passages in the CR and packed everything into my backpack. I headed downstairs in search of David and found him reading through my test.
He took me back to the table upstairs in his amazingly well-stocked Magic loft and gave me his standard instruction spiel, a pile of basic lands, and the thick stack of paper which comprised the test. I set it aside, took up a sheet of blank paper and wrote out my notes sheet confidently. Then I took a deep breath and read the first question. Great - a question about an enchanted land getting copied. These are literally my worst question type. Layers and lands - yuck. The feeling of defeat threatened to overtake me. I chose an answer, wrote a question mark to remind me to come back to it later and moved on.
As I proceeded through the questions, his sweet cat joined me on the couch. Petting a stress-relieving purring ball of fun can make anything less stressful. While I panicked on a few early questions, it did seem to get easier. Around number 14 David came upstairs to check on me and invite me to join his family for dinner. While the barbecue smelled delicious, I didn't want to lose my focus, so I regretfully declined and kept working.
At the halfway mark, I set the test aside, got up for a stretch and a restroom break. When I returned, David was standing there checking on me again. While he seemed sweet and kind, he made me nervous too. I made a mental note that testing at a home is so much less scary than testing at a big event with lots of people around!
I settled back in to finish the test, although I did have a brief break when a cat curled up on my paper. I answered each question then marked whether I considered it complete or wanted to give it another look later. When I got to the policy section at the end, I relaxed. I'm much better at policy than CR. Thankfully may pace picked up too. My brain felt fried.
After completing my first trip through the test, I took another brief break then fought the temptation to just call it done. I forced myself to go back to each question I had marked and review the answer if needed as I transferred my selections to the answer document.
Question 23 stumped me. I had no idea of the rule that applied. So I elected to use what I knew of the game and selected the answer that seemed right. I couldn't justify it really, but it was more of a gut feeling. I could hear Carter's voice in my head saying, "What makes sense?" just as he had when I had asked him for advice on scenarios while studying. I had gone with that on several questions, but this one seemed the most difficult.
I completed the bubbling, stacked my papers neatly then took a few minutes to mentally debrief myself. I realized that either way it turned out, I would know where I stood as far as my knowledge. I surprisingly felt like I did well. That fact scared me a little bit. I feared that I had lulled myself into a false state of feeling competent.
Before I had a chance to go get David, he appeared and noted the stacked papers. He quickly went to work checking my answers, starting with marking #1 wrong. After the first column, I mentally calculated how badly I failed if the pattern continued, but luckily my mistakes seemed to dry up. In fact, I didn't miss a single question in the final column, where the policy questions resided. After calculating the total, the surprise of my well-above passing score registered in my head. The shock left me feeling anxious.
David joined me on the couch and offered to go over any questions I had missed. I asked if he would go over the ones I got right, but was unsure of as well, to which he readily agreed. We walked through the test discussing each question. Number 23's correct answer pleased me, and David detailed why it worked that way. My pleasure increased with the knowledge that my reasoning was correct in addition to my answer selection.
After we finished the debrief, David congratulated me and said, "Now come downstairs and have some dinner." I hesitantly followed him, fearful of imposing on his family time. His wife graciously welcomed me and I joined his son at the table. I enjoyed a delicious meal and wonderful company. Then I got to meet his amazingly cool pet spiders. He and his son enjoyed telling me about each one’s breed and feeding habits. I really wanted to ask a million questions and hang out longer, but the long drive home loomed ahead of me.
In the car, I texted Josh, my judge mentor, and let him know I passed. He replied, "I am stupid proud of you." Then he said, "Did you plan to test?" to which I responded, "Not exactly." I also let my husband know of my passing score.
Then I spent 3 hours on the road ruminating on my crazy day. I began the day as an anxious L1 feeling lost and out of place at a new store, with a new Head Judge, and completely unsure of myself. By then end of the day I felt like I had grown into a confident L2 ready to take on my next challenge.
It's not often I say this, but I'm proud of my work and my accomplishments that day.
And as usual, I have a list of thank you's to go along with it. To my sweet mom and my wonderful husband for watching our kids and making the trip possible. To my sister Lacey for letting me crash at her place at the last minute and for the wonderful dinner Saturday night. To my judge mentor Josh McCurley for answering my questions and being there to talk about everything. To David Carroll for long nights of studying - you are a demanding teacher, but very effective. To Adena Chernosky for writing the steps to cast a spell on sticky notes for me to practice putting in order. To Joe Klopchic for showing me the L3 qualities and honestly evaluating where I stand. To Carter for teaching me to think through the philosophy behind the rules. And to every judge who I have worked with along the way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)